Analysis: Net Neutrality keeps local, online news flowing

By Matt DeRienzo
©2017 Telegraph Publishing LLC

Repealing Net Neutrality would allow giant chain media to work in concert with internet conglomerates to limit access to independent, alternative and local news and information, warns LION Publishers about the upcoming vote by the FCC.

“Giving a clear go-ahead for a tilted playing field would be the result if the Federal Communications Commission tosses out Net Neutrality,” said Dylan Smith, LION’s chairman and the publisher of TucsonSentinel.com.

LION — Local Independent Online News Publishers — is a national nonprofit organization with more than 180 members who operate locally focused news sites in 42 states. The Chester Telegraph, which covers six southern Vermont towns, is a member. The group issued a statement on Monday expressing deep concern about the FCC’s proposal to scrap Net Neutrality rules for the internet, which has grown to become a public good much like the airwaves.

Access to information and local journalism that holds government and other powerful institutions accountable is essential to a functioning democracy, economic well-being and human rights.  These pillars are already under severe strain from the dominance of a handful of large tech platforms as well as the rapid consolidation of the newspaper and broadcasting industry under the control of a few enormous corporate chains.

Local independent online news sites are springing up all over the country to fill gaps in local journalism, but they rely on an internet based on a level playing field for all publishers and readers, regardless of size or resources.

If Net Neutrality goes away, big internet and wireless providers will be able to charge individual publishers for levels of speed and access, a scenario in which a handful of big companies with deep pockets could squeeze out the kind of small, independent news publishers who are part of LION. This would severely limit your access to information and could be devastating to local news, which big publishers have already whittled to the barest of bones.

Essentially, content from corporate interests would be served up as fast as possible, if those corporations paid up. Smaller publishers — including especially local indie outlets such as The Telegraph — would be shoved aside into a “slow lane.” Since studies showing that many readers will abandon slow-loading pages, that means news that isn’t backed by the deepest of pockets would be far less likely to reach the eyes and ears of those who would be purposefully led toward more lowest-common-denominator clickbait, this despite the high-speed fiber optic that places like Chester enjoy.

“We’re quite concerned about the end of Net Neutrality,” said Cynthia Prairie, editor and publisher of The Telegraph. “While our readers rely on us for our role as government watchdogs, they also have come to depend on our fast and reliable information when roads are closed due to tankers overturning, auto accidents, weather or Hazmat spills. Frankly, losing Net Neutrality would be like have a tanker permanently overturned on our Information Superhighway.”

While our readers rely on us for our role as government watchdogs, they also have come to depend on our fast and reliable information when roads are closed due to tankers overturning, auto accidents, weather or Hazmat spills. Frankly, losing Net Neutrality would be like have a tanker permanently overturned on our Information Superhighway.

Cynthia Prairie
The Chester Telegraph 

Charlotte-Anne Lucas, director of NOWCastSA in San Antonio, said, “Our news organization streams government meetings and public events, giving people greater access to government. Scuttling the principles of Net Neutrality would undermine our very democracy by allowing cable, phone and other internet connector companies to throttle our content and limit the public’s access to government.”

Joe Hyde, a former owner of an internet service provider and telecom executive who now publishes San Angelo LIVE! in Texas, said, “The companies that run the internet backbone and provide direct customer connections have the ability – on the tech end – to throttle our small sites — which they can do in an overall or individually targeted way — making real local news less accessible than traffic for a chain media property that pays them. And that would stifle both future innovation and our ability to build sustainable, lasting local news organizations.”

“If you don’t like dealing with your cable company or picking a service package for your cell phone today, imagine what it would be like if all of your internet activities were affected by what giant media companies were willing to pay extra for behind the scenes,” Hyde said.

Added Teresa Wippel, publisher of the My Neighborhood News Network in Washington state: “This proposal threatens the very nature of open, online access to vital news that in many communities is citizens’ only source of information. Any proposal that slows down or blocks access to news that people need to become fully informed citizens is unacceptable.”

The internet has grown by leaps and bounds in large part because it has been an equal playing field. ISPs certainly should be able to base their rates on the quantity of data being transmitted, but they should not be in the business of setting rates based on the types of content that they convey to readers, viewers and users.

And they certainly should not be able to provide favored status to those content creators and data services who pay them more.

The proposal to eliminate Net Neutrality rules would create an opaque layer of market manipulation that will serve to enrich the few at the expense of many, and undermine the free flow of news and information that is essential to our democratic society.

Matt DeRienzo is executive director of LION Publishers, the association of Local Independent Online News Publishers of which The Chester Telegraph is a member.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: CommentaryTelegraph Editorial

About the Author:

RSSComments (0)

Trackback URL

Leave a Reply