Repeals of Act 181 portions zip through Legislature '...a lot of things went sideways ... but this solves the problem, for now'
Shawn Cunningham | May 06, 2026 | Comments 1
By Shawn Cunningham
© 2026 Telegraph Publishing LLC
As regular readers will know, the law is Act 181 (a reform of the state’s land use law, Act 250) and singularly unpopular are the portions that promised greater restrictions on rural areas while downtowns got exemptions.
Last Thursday, May 1, the House Environment Committee finished marking up a Senate bill (S.325) to turn it into the repeal of a number of the law’s sections including the Road Rule and Tier 3. On a vote of 11-0, the committee sent it to the House Floor, which automatically sent it to the Committee on Ways and Means. At 2:05 that afternoon, members of the Ways and Means Committee heard brief descriptions of the bill from Legislative counsel Ellen Czajkowski and an analysis of the financial ramifications from Ted Barnett of the Joint Fiscal Office.
With little discussion, Vice Chair William Canfield of Rutland moved to find the bill “favorable” and send it on to the Appropriations Committee. But not before Rep. James Masland of Thetford Center had a say.

Rep. Masland saying that he wished the process had played out differently, but “this solves the problem, for now.”
“In general terms, I know why we ended up where we are,” said Masland. “We passed 181 and a lot of things went sideways … This seems to me to be the practical result given how we work here … I wish the process had evolved differently and we could have spent more time working through the meritorious parts of Act 181 and come up with better solutions. But this solves the problem, for now.”
The committee then voted 10-0-1, with Masland in the majority, to send the bill to Appropriations.
On Friday morning, Appropriations got the same briefings and quickly voted in favor of the bill by the same 10-0-1 vote.
As of May 5, S.325 is on the House Notice Calendar, which means it will be getting a vote soon, perhaps Wednesday, May 6. Passage is about as certain as the sun coming up that day and once that happens, the bill will head back to the Senate for reconciliation.
Filed Under: Latest News
About the Author:

Rep Masland doesn’t describe “the problem” which is Vermonters rebelled against an over-reaching Democrat majority that passed Act 181 over the Governor’s veto last session. The “problem” is that Vermonters found out about the ramifications of an unelected LURB board overlaying the state with location based Tiers that trigger oppressive “rules” that infringe on individuals rights to decide how to use their property. It’s an election year and a lot of Democrats and Independents rebelled over this which could have cost Democrats control over the Legislature. Rep. Masland says “the problem “ (vermont citizens) is solved “for now”……what does that mean? If Vermonters elect Democrats and they gain the super majority again, they will bring it back. Rest assured voting for Democrats Heather Chase and Will Hoser will bring this bill back whether you like it or not. Vote Republican this fall if you don’t want to lose your rights to your property.