GM board sends same budget back for May 12 re-vote
Shawn Cunningham | Apr 22, 2026 | Comments 2

Superintendent Layne Millington explains the tradeoffs in several versions of the 2026-27 budget. Photos by Shawn Cunningham
By Shawn Cunningham
© 2026 Telegraph Publishing LLC
Addressing residents’ concerns over possible higher taxes, Two Rivers Superintendent Layne Millington gave a presentation to show how little the burden for taxpayers would be eased even if the board cut the budget enough to result in layoffs.

Millington’s presentation had a number of scenarios which showed that the damage from cuts would be out of proportion with the savings for taxpayers.
He also noted that tax rates are impacted greatly by the Common Level of Appraisal, which the state uses to equalize the values of homes to make taxes more equitable. Town-wide appraisals in Andover and Baltimore have lowered those towns’ tax rates, but Cavendish and Chester remain on a waiting list for their appraisals, since there are few companies that conduct them. Chester’s next appraisal will occur in 2027 and 2028, taking effect in 2029. Since the CLA is expressed as a three-year average, the impact will be muted at first.
And while the board recently approved sending notices of a reduction in force to employees, board members believed that the way to avoid RIFs was to put the original $19 million budget up for re-vote and conduct a better, more effective information campaign.
The budget that voters rejected in March contained the same level of services as the current year’s budget but those now cost $724,000 more. Level funding in that budget would result in a number of positions being cut to achieve those savings.

Using three scenarios, this chart compares the tax savings per $100,000 of assessed value and for the average ($385,000) Vermont home compared to the number of staff that would need to be let go.
“No board member is in favor of reducing staff,” said Andover representative Shayna Kalnitsky.
With three cost-cutting scenarios (including level funding) in addition to the original budget, Cavendish representative Mike Ripley exhorted the board to “pick one tonight.”
After discussion and re-adoption of the budget that was turned down in March by a margin of 37 votes out of 1,013 ballots cast, the board considered picking one of the reduction scenarios as a backup for a third vote if the May 12 vote fails. Ripley again spoke up saying that voters would see that as being “held hostage,” and react badly. The idea was dropped.
There was then discussion of how to get the word out about the budget. Yard signs, letters to the editor and a postcard mailing were all suggested along with social media postings. The materials paid for by the district legally cannot tell people how to vote but can simply encourage them to vote. The postcard would be the most expensive route, but several board members noted that that method failed to convince voters to pass a school renovation bond in 2022, which was defeated by 47 votes.
The board also scheduled an information meeting regarding the budget re-vote for 6 p.m. on Tuesday, May 5 at Green Mountain Union High School, 716 Route 103 south and remotely via Zoom.
Long agenda cut and some tense exchanges
Thursday night’s agenda was unusually long with a number of people coming to voice their opinions on the budget, which came late on the agenda.There were some contentious moments in the process of cutting and moving items to other parts of the agenda but the most tense part of the meeting was a request by Cavendish representative Donovan Nichols to replace a portion of the minutes from a meeting in January with text that he said better reflected that discussion.

Board member Penny Benelli asked that the board put a presentation on reducing bullying on the next meeting agenda
There was some pointed questioning of what Nichols wanted by board members Adrienne Williams of Baltimore and Katie Murphy of Chester and when it came to voting on his request several of the new members abstained. The votes went against Nichols and the request failed.
When the board took up the “Future Meeting (s) and Agenda Item(s)” Chester representative Penny Benelli asked that a presentation on reducing bullying be scheduled for the next meeting. Board chair Lisa Sanders said they would not be doing that but rather at the next meeting they would discuss whether they want a presentation on reducing bullying.
Lastly, Chester resident Randy Miles rose to complain about The Telegraph’s status as paper of record. Miles stated that that the paper is biased because it ran an editorial and a letter to the editor that did not align with this beliefs.
And he was upset that when he did not answer questions in a Q&A formatted article the paper printed that he declined to answer. Board members asked questions and discussed this but no action was taken.
Miles also asked about the status of his complaint that materials inside the school that refer to LGBTQ+ rights and Black Lives Matter violate the same policy that banned discriminatory mascot branding. Miles was a vocal advocate for keeping the Chieftain name for the school’s sports teams.
Millington said that the policy, which arose out of Act 152 which, bans any discriminatory “name, symbol, or image used by a school as a mascot, nickname, logo, letterhead, team name, slogan, motto, or other identifier.” Millington maintained the sort of materials Miles referred to did not fit under that definition and were not banned from the school.
Miles disagreed, saying that the subjects that have appeared in classrooms are “other identifiers.”
Filed Under: Education News • Featured • Latest News
About the Author:

I need to make this clear here. You need to listen to this nights meeting on SAPA to hear what is not being reported. I was at this meeting and spoke of why I feel the Telephgraph is bias in there reporting. I did answer the 6 questions in running for the school board and my response were rewritten by this Chester Telegraph. Not at all what I gave for my answers. No report here of that or of one or more board members agreeing with me with lengthy conversation. 2 nd thing I talked about was policies of banners display in classrooms and schools? I was asked by parents and some students why it was ok to display banners for some groups,when our Act 152 and E5 about branding and Nondiscriminatory Act does not allow it. Or if we were in violation or not? Our image of a Native American inside and outside of the school building? The image was removed for pointing to a specific group even though it was chosen for honorable reasons. In other words no pointing to any race,color,national origin,sexual orientgation or gender identity of any person or group. It was to be fair by not being bias to one group or another. When parents and students asked me why banners were allowed in classrooms that pointed to specific groups. I could not answer that? For one I did not know if there were any postings in any of our classrooms or schools? On the other hand it did not seem right to show favoritism to some group and not others in our schools if they were there.I was not sure if even there was a policy in place? If banners were in place was that fair for all or bias? If no policy then anything and every group could have displays in classrooms in our schools? This was the purpose of the discussion. Being fair is there a policy stating what is ok and not? If no policy then our schools could be open to groups, individuals and advertising none of us would want or like. What would be worse we may not be able to stop it if protected by lack of policy. would our own Constitution then allow any and all groups to display banners? Not to make anyone take offens. It really does not matter what the banners in the classroom are only that there are banners pointing to groups listed in the Act 152 or E5 policy. I would find it strange if Act 152 and E5 did not cover this in the classroom as well? Schools should be neutral to all it is a place of learning. Not picking sides or groups for reasons good or bad. Could you imagine classrooms filled with banners of all kinds and I mean all kinds on walls and ceiling, that would be fair to all. Or a school teaching bias learning? Who gets to choose the bias then? This part of the meeting was about policy or lack of one. Not any one group or another. What is fair for all or maybe bias.I am about the issues and what is fair for all in the policies or lack of them. Some easy to talk about some not so much, but still need to have a conversation.
After listening to this meeting, I want to clarify a few important points raised during Mr. Miles’ complaints to the school board.
Vermont’s 2022 mascot law applies specifically to official school mascots, logos, and team names. It does not extend to classroom materials such as posters or displays intended to foster an inclusive and respectful learning environment. Conflating the school mascot with classroom materials is a misunderstanding of the law.
Public schools are tasked with creating environments where all students feel safe, respected, and able to learn. Classroom materials that reflect inclusivity are part of that responsibility.
The suggestion that members of the public should walk through classrooms to identify or evaluate specific viewpoints is not appropriate. Schools limit access to classrooms to protect student privacy, maintain safety, and preserve a productive learning environment. Allowing community members to monitor or single out particular messages in classrooms would undermine those protections and the professional role of educators.
Decisions about classroom materials are guided by school and district policies, with the goal of supporting all students. Questions or complaints like this should be brought forward through established public channels, such as school board meetings, where they can be addressed constructively and transparently.
Mr. Miles’ complaints to the school board begin at approximately 2:58 into the meeting recording. For those interested in hearing the full context of this discussion, the school board meeting can be viewed here: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1l8ayD1HuscZwQnjgu6t8hiJ5drqCeTTm.